Blaming Obama for the flow of the nation's wealth into fewer and fewer hands, or for the fact that DC is full of rich lobbyists, is like blaming him for global warming. He has nothing to do with it. It started long before he got here. And you know it will only get worse after he is gone, especially if he is replaced by a Republican.
You bludgeon us with all these intimidating statistics as if they gave your argument some kind of legitimacy. They don't. All they really do is distract us from the fact you have no case at all. You know perfectly well they would all still be true if John Mcain had been elected in 2008 and again in 2012. In fact, they would probably be worse. If you want my guy to solve a problem your guys created, then stop sabotaging everything he tries to do.
DC is rich because rich corporate lobbyists live there. Got that? Lobbyists, businessmen (and politicians, lawyers and public relations and marketing drones) are not straw men. They are very real villains. And they don't work for me.
Of course, I suppose you'd rather blame it all on the unions, the MSM, Hollywood elitists, lefty kollege perfessers, and the Sierra Club.
Do they live in Washington DC, too?
Current Events » in reply to Liberal policy isn't working to well
Meticulously documented irrelevancies
The whole thread (41 posts)
- Where the money is
- Well, it's not here. I just looked around.
- Interesting thread
- Objection: assumes facts not in evidence.
- Did you read all the links?
- I scanned that piece. It does not establish what you claim is established in this thread.
- I'd rather design harmonica holders than discuss Aztec anthropology.
- Did you read all the links?
- Objection: assumes facts not in evidence.
- Money is meaningless.
- Wealth is concentrated in the states that you claim have hatred for business. Amazing.
- I'll take military/industrial/surveillance complex for $500 billion
- Geographical distribution is interesting, but tells you little.
