re: I found your problem... the 3/14 would be 2 weeks after the 2/28...

Space/Science » in reply to Final corrected comment: March 11 is 2 weeks after February, 28, 2006

Chris Vancil — 12/20/2005 9:21:54 PM (archived)

you addition stinks!

Ever time someone shows you are wrong about something instead of saying "thank you" and/or "I'm sorry" you rant and/or complain!

The whole thread (8 posts)

people ARE working on cratering chronology... - Nick Hoffman - 12/19/2005 10:17:23 PM
- March - E.P., the nice guy - 12/20/2005 3:46:23 PM
  - Don't "assume" just go to the conference and find out. - nick hoffman - 12/21/2005 3:32:55 AM
  - CORRECTION - E.P., the nice guy - 12/20/2005 4:04:41 PM
    - Final corrected comment: March 11 is 2 weeks after February, 28, 2006 - E.P., the nice guy - 12/20/2005 4:36:04 PM
      - re: I found your problem... the 3/14 would be 2 weeks after the 2/28... - Chris Vancil - 12/20/2005 9:21:54 PM
        
        Thanks, Chris - E.P., the nice guy - 12/21/2005 1:45:28 PM
        
        re: You're welcome, but you should be apologizing to Nick. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/21/2005 4:14:47 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (8 posts)