Geek Speak » in reply to Double bummer

The whole thread (25 posts)

• Just a HTML test - SteveS - 12/23/2005 3:42:33 PM
  • Better late than never - Robert - 1/12/2006 11:26:14 PM
  • re: Just a HTML test - McFly - 12/23/2005 6:45:14 PM
    • Ok, I'll try it again - SteveS - 12/23/2005 8:06:32 PM
      • Double bummer - SteveS - 12/23/2005 8:12:25 PM
        • re: Double bummer - McFly - 12/25/2005 9:45:12 PM
          • re: Double bummer - SteveS - 12/26/2005 5:56:57 AM
            • I'm sorry Steve... - McFly - 12/26/2005 6:51:06 PM
              • Thanks, but no joy. I'll leave it for the knowledgeable ;-) - SteveS - 12/27/2005 6:56:14 PM
        • Curiosity getting the best of me - SteveS - 12/23/2005 10:50:46 PM
          • Test - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2005 8:00:22 AM
            • That is weird. - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2005 8:01:56 AM
              • It's still a zoo... (n/t) - et - 12/26/2005 6:56:51 PM
              • It's still a zoo... (n/t) - et - 12/25/2005 7:20:18 PM
                • It's still a zoo... (n/t) - et - 12/26/2005 6:55:50 PM
                  • Just a little testing... (n/t) - et - 12/26/2005 7:13:33 PM
                • HOW do you do that?... (n/t) - R.L. - 12/26/2005 1:47:32 AM
                  • clue: you can look at the source codes - Fox - 12/26/2005 3:27:36 AM
                    • I don't think that's what i'm doing... If so it's inadvertent... (n/t) - et - 12/26/2005 7:12:39 PM
                      • It's what I get on the page source, so it's at least how what you're doing shows up.... (n/t) - Fox - 12/27/2005 3:39:44 AM
                • Try putting up a picture. That's what people were doing. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2005 8:34:49 PM
                  • I was ne of them . (n/t) - e-legal transmission - 12/27/2005 2:36:06 AM
          • Now that was really wierd. (n/t) - SteveS - 12/23/2005 10:52:52 PM
    • Now yer just showing off. (n/t) - alcaray - 12/23/2005 7:38:13 PM
  • Bummer (n/t) - SteveS - 12/23/2005 3:43:39 PM