Do you have any idea what the percentage of leads that pan out is in normal police work?
The New York Times is so ignorant on this subject that not only have they already sawed off the limb they were on, but they're still sawing all the way down. The Left also still hasn't figured out that screaming "illegal" as loud as you can is not considered evidence in most courts.
I was going to go into details, but I found this blog post that does it for me just fine. The link in that post is also a good read.
I strongly suggest in the future when you read a New York Times article that you don't let your brain go fuzzy when you get to parts that don't fit the agenda.
Current Events » in reply to So how useful exactly is this illegal intel gathering program?
re: intel gathering program
The whole thread (8 posts)
- So how useful exactly is this illegal intel gathering program?
- re: intel gathering program
- re: "A trained investigator never would have devoted the resources to take those leads to the next level, but after 9/11, you had to."
