I believe that apocalyptic nightmares are the inevitable conclusion one would expect if one assumed that humans will continue doing the exact same thing they are doing today. I believe this is a mistake. My predictions of the future are of transition. I am certain changes will occur and adaptations made. Some perhaps will seem horrifying by todays tastes, but when they happen they will be accepted as realistic and practical for reasons that haven't yet impacted us in the minutia of our daily lives.
And if you think about his predictions in this context, well, he isn't predicting extinction of the human race, is he? I wonder if he realizes that he has actually suggested a means of survival in spite of his doom and gloom scenario. There's always a way, and I doubt it will be as bad, or as sudden as he suggests, if future transitions are bad at all. Some might be, obviously.
Space/Science » in reply to The Earth
Historically, apocalyptic predictions of the future have been made based on the assumption of static conditions of the present
The whole thread (21 posts)
- The Earth
- re: The Earth
- Negative thinking is the wrong way to go.
- Lovelock's depiction is outside of the scientific mainstream, just like warming denialists
- Pessimism with certainty is absurdity
- Considering rapidity, inertia and viral mutation with increased temperature,
- Historically, apocalyptic predictions of the future have been made based on the assumption of static conditions of the present
- rJames Lovelock doesn't really believe what he says.
- re: He's insane.
