"Why didn't we go after bin Laden?"
"Where's bin Laden?" "Why didn't Bush get bin Laden?"
Seem to recall hearing that sort of thing a few times from some people around here.
But based on your current, somewhat fluid views, apparently there would have been no point, right? He would just have been replaced. Why bother?
Do you even try to match your opinions to see if they cancel each other out, or is that too much work?