Step one is pretty much what we're doing now. Applying diplomatic pressure. We're at the very beginning of a diplomatic and U.N. process that started after the first Gulf War with Iraq. After a number of years, it became obvious that that wouldn't work. I suspect it won't work on Iran either, but it has to be tried.
Step Two is encouraging the Iranian population to resist. The mullahs are a lot more vulnerable than Saddam was. Unions in Iran are setting themselves in opposition to the leadership. It's possible that Iran needs military action a lot less than it needs a Lech Walesa.
We also need much better intelligence. Are the nuclear facilities vulnerable to precision strikes or not? I've seen credible arguments both ways. A solid analysis of this would give us a better idea what our options are.
And of course, nobody knows what Israel, the prime target, is going to do.
Current Events » in reply to So deter. You're all talk up til now.
re: So deter. You're all talk up til now.
The whole thread (21 posts)
- For once, a just analogy: Merkel likens Ahmadinejad to Hitler
- re: For once, a just analogy: Merkel likens Ahmadinejad to Hitler
- they say Iranians are very good at chess
- Deterring a lunatic
- re:What if Iran were to build said nuke, and detonate it clandestinely?
- re: For once, a just analogy: Merkel likens Ahmadinejad to Hitler
