Interesting link, Tom, thanks.
So far it seems like a pretty good plan and promises improvement. I'm kind of curious what parts of it you found disagreeable. The paper is critical of the Bush Administration, but then it's logically impossible to advocate change without criticizing the status quo. If you want to read some really snide comments, reread the famous PNAC blueprint for the 21st Century, which portrayed the US as a 98 pound weakling (published in 1993, after 12 years of Republicans in the White House, but I'll let it slide).
If you can, try to factor out the salesmanship that's critical of your guy and a bit pro forma. I'm curious to read the reaction of our cadre of former military people, too.
Current Events » in reply to Liberal alternatives on defense spending
57 of 108
