Let's assume I've made an error, you get to explain why. You answered affirmative to questions #1, #2, and #3, but then answered negative to question #4. More specifically, you agreed that from the vantage point near to the event horizon of the black hole, the rate of infalling matter would increase. You in fact elaborated on my suggestion, stating that "all of the light in future history, violet shifted into gamma rays, strikes the object destroying it utterly."

You failed to make the connection however, the point I was trying to persuade you of, that, all the light in future history would also strike the black hole. Indeed, all the infalling matter in future history would also strike the black hole, and the mass of the black hole would increase accordingly, as would the geometric Schwarzschild radius --- although the apparent radius might be relativistically delayed for the observer. As I suggested in question #4, this implies that all the matter in the universe would get sucked in. Your response that from a large distance the black hole would appear normal was irrelevant, because I wasn't talking about an observer from a larger distance. The observer would be as close to the event horizon as possible.

If you would review my list of questions again, maybe there IS an error, and I'd like to know what it is, if there is one!