As you might remember, I have found over 140 independent definitions of terrorism, and I have mentioned the difficulties of settling on a comprehensive one that goes beyond the -I know it when I see it_-subjectivity of most. You will not both the FBI and DOD daffynitions exclude state sponsored terrorism as well as terrorism from the state itself. Definitional problems aside:
There is a commonality existing between fundamentalist of all stripes. They and their God are in agreement on who they hate. When you are doing God's work in bombing an abortion clinic, firebombing an adult book store, or murdering a lawyer or television commentator all have in common that they are indefensible actions. You are the Ayn Rand fan, and if "a" always equals "a" then there can be no distinctions between right and wrong in your language. Thus, it would behove your moral consistency to drop this equivalence horse shit.
Do you have any questions?
Publius
Flame » in reply to Equivalence
re: Equivalence or commonality
The whole thread (38 posts)
- Act of Christian Terrorism in Tennessee
- Rather loose use of the word "Terrorism."
- Nothing "Christian" about it. (n/t)
- He was ok with the arson until he realized it was a sin?
- I really think fundy influence is declining
- Is this on Flame because he's an arsonist?
- "Police say a Bible college student charged with setting fire to an adult bookstore confessed to the crime after realizing it was a sin. "
- Christian Jihadist