As a computer programmer it would be relatively easy to insert extremely cryptic code into a touch screen machine that could be activated by some combination of touching spots on the screen. I could hide the code so deep and so cryptically that no other programmer could spot it. No I/O device would be necessary to insert the code. It would already be there.
The only way we'll know that machines haven't been tampered with is for them to produce a paper receipt of the votes the voter cast and allow the voter to audit them when they are finished. They would then be placed in a secure place and available for recounts.
Don't get me wrong. Technology is a wonderful tool but has huge security holes in it. Maybe its application in voting is a bad idea.
Art
Current Events » in reply to Scientists call Diebold security flaw 'worst ever'
re: Scientists call Diebold security flaw 'worst ever'
The whole thread (6 posts)
- Scientists call Diebold security flaw 'worst ever'
- re: Scientists call Diebold security flaw 'worst ever'
- re: Scientists call Diebold security flaw 'worst ever'
- Our electronic machines will have printer backup in the next election. (n/t)
- Too bad punch cards seem so hard for so many.
- "Ultimately, there's no way to get rid of the huge security flaws in the design,"
