Ok, so you haven't read the paper.

Flame » in reply to An auxiliary Flame about scientific papers...

ET — 6/2/2006 5:48:01 PM (archived)

Just curious, but...

Which syntactic hacking denialist shill told you that the comment about relative net balance was a valid criticisim? Is that something one can only get behind the NRO firewall?

Links...

The whole thread (12 posts)

Another Broszesque trivial observation. Liars and Shills on climate change via TP. - et - 6/2/2006 5:13:09 PM
- link - et - 6/2/2006 5:14:27 PM
  - re: link - Tom Brosz - 6/2/2006 5:36:32 PM
    - You read the paper? - et - 6/2/2006 5:43:24 PM
    - An auxiliary Flame about scientific papers... - Tom Brosz - 6/2/2006 5:43:13 PM
      - re: An auxiliary Flame about scientific papers... - gbaikie - 6/2/2006 11:59:04 PM
        
        "Obviously global warming is not an important issue." (n/t) - et quoting gb - 6/4/2006 9:57:22 PM
      - Ok, so you haven't read the paper. - ET - 6/2/2006 5:48:01 PM
        
        I suspect you haven't. - Tom Brosz - 6/2/2006 10:39:14 PM
        
        Is that a no? BTW, cite your source... (n/t) - et - 6/3/2006 6:38:17 PM
        
        Uh....it's the paper we've been talking about through the whole thread? - Tom Brosz - 6/3/2006 8:43:34 PM
        
        look for Iain Murray posts - Tony - 6/2/2006 6:13:33 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (12 posts)