Try this. Sorry if the spittle level isn't up to standards.

Of course, it's probably all lies, unlike the unimpeachable "One Percent Doctrine."

And Matt should know that identifying someone, and leading to his capture, are two different things. Come to think of it, he probably does know, but figured the distinction would slip past his typical audience.

The Bush speech:

For example, Zubaydah identified one of KSM's accomplices in the 9/11 attacks -- a terrorist named Ramzi bin al Shibh. The information Zubaydah provided helped lead to the capture of bin al Shibh. And together these two terrorists provided information that helped in the planning and execution of the operation that captured Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Matthew:

As promised, some further analysis of Bush's contention that torture is awesome because torturing Abu Zubaydah led him to "identif[y] one of KSM's accomplices in the 9/11 attacks -- a terrorist named Ramzi bin al Shibh."

Followed by a long tirade on how we already knew who he was.