When you say, <"A prime technique of those trying to sabotage real debate is the destruction of the terminology until the debate can no longer take place.">
The unfortunate thing is having said this, you then proceed to do it. You are determined to define terrorism via the dictionary according to George Bush. To only focus on your limited self-serving definition as terrorism being something done to the US by those hated Islamo-fascist not only limits any debate it makes attempts at it absurd.
Perhaps you feel you have been pushed into this polarized position, but you are in grave danger of entering into the outer limits of mental masturbation with this mindless defense of administration policy and refusal to address the issues of what constitutes terrorism.
You bring us so much information, entertainment, pleasure, etc. on so many of your other posts, please abandon your embarassing pursuit of finding a rational for the administrations policy on terrorism. Pretty please?
Publius
Current Events » in reply to As I pointed out in another post...
Tom, I certainly agree with you........
The whole thread (21 posts)
- Many Arab officials say al-Qaida is in a different category, one representing true terrorists. Al-Akwa agreed.
