re: Popular Mechanics article on nuclear power

Space/Science » in reply to Popular Mechanics article on nuclear power

Michael Gmirkin — 9/20/2006 7:31:05 PM (archived)

And on an unrelated note:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1281426.html

Not overkill my butt... Upwards of the equivalent of 45000-1,000,000 rounds of ammunition per minute? That DOES seem a BIT like overkill. Trippy concept though!

The future is a weird, weird place. Cool article.

~Michael

The whole thread (11 posts)

Popular Mechanics article on nuclear power - Tom Brosz - 9/20/2006 6:20:07 PM
- Build the 2nd Seabrook nuke now - phil - 9/21/2006 5:24:27 PM
- Interesting article. - Bowser - 9/21/2006 4:53:08 AM
  - re: Interesting article. - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2006 5:11:37 AM
    - I agree. - Bowser - 9/21/2006 5:31:30 AM
      - Paranoid - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2006 6:03:38 AM
        
        Well. - Bowser - 9/21/2006 7:56:55 AM
        
        re: Well. - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2006 3:56:38 PM
        
        Good point. - Bowser - 9/22/2006 4:29:58 AM
    - Lack of the nerve to do it...? - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2006 5:21:02 AM
- re: Popular Mechanics article on nuclear power - Michael Gmirkin - 9/20/2006 7:31:05 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (11 posts)