Went to the site Tom and it's clearly a partisan agency. What possibly makes you believe that because you post some person's opinions that has had no credibility established, it should be taken as fact? At least in Woodward's case he's got a bit of a history for the truth.

Problem you have is that so many who've been inside the corridors of power have come out giving exactly the same view of acts by the administration. The sheer volume is damning Tom and your only response is to discredit each one. Has to be starting to feel like the kid in Holland with his finger in the dike as new holes start spouting water.

Art