Current Events » in reply to North Korea

The whole thread (16 posts)

• North Korea - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2006 9:06:41 PM
  • Ummm, did I miss something? - Tony - 10/6/2006 11:36:01 PM
    • "Nuclear attack capacity" has an exact meaning. - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 5:36:24 PM
      • Still it is a question of time, rather than capability. - alcaray - 10/7/2006 9:01:38 PM
    • They may have several nukes... - Lee - 10/6/2006 11:53:13 PM
  • Meet the "unofficial spokesman" - Alan G. Archer - 10/6/2006 11:35:22 PM
    • Update: KMC hails from Tokyo (n/t) - Alan G. Archer - 10/9/2006 11:24:52 AM
  • Threatening to use nukes. - Bowser - 10/6/2006 9:22:51 PM
    • Everybody wants deterrence. How can you blame them for that? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/7/2006 12:05:01 AM
      • (misplaced post - should have been for our REB) (n/t) - alcaray - 10/7/2006 12:05:57 AM
    • I should Ignor this post. - REB - 10/6/2006 9:49:29 PM
      • Who else has been this crazy? - Bowser - 10/6/2006 11:32:09 PM
        • re: Who else has been this crazy? - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 10:50:05 PM
          • And? You think North Korea would nuke the US first? - Bowser - 10/8/2006 1:16:15 AM
            • Are you saying Kim is sane? - Jacob Samorodin - 10/8/2006 7:44:23 PM
              • Are we playing the 'Who's Line is it Anyway?' game where everything must be a question? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/8/2006 11:48:40 PM