re: No, there isn't a conspiracy

Space/Science » in reply to No, there isn't a conspiracy

Jeff F — 10/23/2006 2:47:02 PM (archived)

Nick , I agree with everything you posted here. My question is that this NEO has been discussed and watched for sometime now ( A few years) , and the results seem to come out the same. Now I'm not saying that I know 100% for sure that this is an impactor, but something this much in question needs to be brought to light and studied deeply.

The whole thread (8 posts)

Asteroid impact 2035? - Jeff F - 10/23/2006 12:14:13 PM
- Call Mike Griffin's office - it's his job - E.P. - 10/23/2006 4:03:31 PM
  - re: Call Mike Griffin's office - it's his job - Jeff F - 10/23/2006 4:43:45 PM
    - So call Mike Griffin's office - it's his job - E.P. - 10/23/2006 6:03:14 PM
- No, there isn't a conspiracy - nick hoffman - 10/23/2006 2:07:12 PM
  - re: No, there isn't a conspiracy - Jeff F - 10/23/2006 2:47:02 PM
    - Knowing for sure - Buck Galaxy - 10/23/2006 11:31:49 PM
    - re: One of the first missions outn of LEO needs to be to this NEO... - Chris Vancil - 10/23/2006 8:39:20 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (8 posts)