Didn't mean it to singe. Maybe would have been more appropriate to respond directly under Jack's post, but there it would have been useless.
I just wanted someone who actually USES his brain here to follow the same track I do and see how I come to these conclusions. So many times people act like I just pull analysis out of the air, despite the links and background I post. Cripes, people are not SUPPOSED to "take my word for it." People are supposed to look at the data, and arrive at the same place. It's so goddam FRUSTRATING sometimes.
I am sick of crap from tinfoil web sites being passed for news here without criticism. Jack's post is not the first time this particular conspiracy theory showed up here, and you have to understand that the Great Conspiracy is a consistent theme here and has been for years.
Did you see Bowser's response to my post? The entire thing slid off the surface of his brain like mercury off a glass dome. That's typical, unfortunately.
Current Events » in reply to re: Trying to explain the Iraq Disaster
Sorry
The whole thread (19 posts)
- Trying to Contain the Iraq Disaster
- They are again saying "12 to 18 months". Said the same at the start.
- re: Trying to explain the Iraq Disaster
- Sorry
- No problem. (n/t)
- Sources
- Clearly it's not reported because there is no access allowed.
- This post incorrectly placed. I meant to respond to J. Herer's post below. (n/t)
- Sorry
- Meanwhile: 2,801
