The New York Times and others have subjected Bush to a steady rain of shit since the election of 2000. Nonstop. On all subjects, on every policy, sometimes changing positions as Bush does to maintain themselves in opposition. Firmly in the corner of the Democratic Party.

They have released, and continue to release, classified information that aids our enemies, judging themselves, unelected and subject to no court approvals, to be the arbiters of what should be secret and what should not. And seemingly using, as their only criteria, "will releasing this information damage Bush and the war effort?"

As I've pointed out before, if there is one major story they've written on the war on terror that would not have been written exactly the same way if our enemies were paying them to write it, I'd like to see it.

They've got a hell of a nerve bringing up "ugly behavior."