Current Events » in reply to Why would it be anything but mostly local?

The whole thread (18 posts)

• This is a test of our mainstream media - TB - 11/2/2006 6:43:03 PM
  • Never heard of them. (n/t) - ER - 11/2/2006 7:03:11 PM
  • The answer sheet - TB - 11/2/2006 6:56:58 PM
    • It it were Republicans. - dtb - 11/3/2006 1:17:15 AM
      • Test would be more valid if you'd asked the question a year ago. (n/t) - TB - 11/3/2006 1:50:38 AM
        • OK, so I searched: No coverage - dtb - 11/4/2006 5:37:30 AM
        • With your famed searching skills? Easy peasy - tony - 11/3/2006 4:00:34 AM
          • Typo - I spelled Four with a T, w and o. (n/t) - tony - 11/3/2006 4:03:33 AM
            • The point, which seems to have completely eluded you... - TB - 11/3/2006 6:09:03 AM
              • So I checked the archives: No Coverage - dtb - 11/4/2006 4:23:59 PM
              • Nice shifting of the goalposts. Take the ball too next time. - tony - 11/3/2006 6:18:31 AM
                • Try reading the first post again. Slowly this time. (n/t) - TB - 11/3/2006 5:00:46 PM
                  • My reading comprehension is just fine thank you. - Tony - 11/3/2006 7:36:23 PM
    • If Republicans..... - Tony - 11/2/2006 7:26:26 PM
      • re: If Republicans..... - dtb - 11/3/2006 1:18:04 AM
  • Why would it be anything but mostly local? - Tony - 11/2/2006 6:48:27 PM
    • Because they are a national political organization? (n/t) - Scott Evil - 11/2/2006 8:10:13 PM
    • Point out a congressional election that is not mostly local. (n/t) - TB - 11/2/2006 7:13:26 PM