Current Events » in reply to re: It is very easy to hide from an invading army

The whole thread (19 posts)

• If it weren't for oil and ego, this is how it should have been done. - Bowser - 11/15/2006 4:52:38 PM
  • A bit more on Baker policies - TB - 11/16/2006 5:26:18 AM
  • Dickey is mistaken - TB - 11/15/2006 9:43:43 PM
    • What you're saying is that this "war" can't be won. The "breeder reactor" course. - Bowser - 11/16/2006 2:58:36 AM
    • It is very easy to hide from an invading army - Raoul - 11/15/2006 10:39:51 PM
      • re: It is very easy to hide from an invading army - TB - 11/15/2006 11:54:33 PM
        • re: It is very easy to hide from an invading army - Laurie Street - 11/16/2006 12:25:51 AM
          • Key question - dtb - 11/16/2006 1:10:29 AM
            • re: Key question - TB - 11/16/2006 3:59:02 AM
              • Preserving Iraq.. - Raoul - 11/16/2006 8:24:08 AM
                • You could make the same case for preserving the Shah of Iran. - TB - 11/16/2006 9:24:21 PM
                  • It has never been our practice to invade all countries with tyrants. - alcaray - 11/16/2006 9:37:18 PM
            • A British poll found around 40% of British Muslims could relate to the London Bombers. - Lee - 11/16/2006 3:49:57 AM
              • "Relate to" doesn't exactly correspond to "willing to kill" - Laurie Street - 11/16/2006 5:50:42 PM
              • Links, and more on the "key question." - TB - 11/16/2006 4:22:55 AM
    • "- - -so long as the "aberrant ideology" thrives, so will the terrorists - - - " - Bowser - 11/15/2006 10:33:35 PM
  • Abizaid - may have to increase troop levels "but I believe that is only temporary". - Bowser - 11/15/2006 6:42:11 PM
  • Not listening to reason - Lindy - 11/15/2006 5:32:16 PM
    • Even from a Republican think tank. (n/t) - Bowser - 11/15/2006 6:33:07 PM