re: Golombeck, Squyres, and Bell

Space/Science » in reply to Golombeck, Squyres, and Bell

Chris Vancil in AZ — 12/16/2006 2:17:49 AM (archived)

Well, I sampled the same people about a year or two later than you and got slightly different results.

All three wanted to have more robotic missions, but viewed manned missions as magnatudes better at gathering data therefore more cost effective in the long run.

It might have been how we asked our questions or the atmosphere, but in both cases it was long before MM&B.

The whole thread (12 posts)

Moon Plans Raise Mars Worries... "The best way to explore Mars is with humans,'' Squyres said - Chris Vancil in AZ - 12/14/2006 1:24:25 PM
- Mars Plan Raise Earth Worries - E.P. - 12/14/2006 7:18:05 PM
  - re: Marsis - Raoul - 12/14/2006 8:04:20 PM
    - re: Marsis - E.P. - 12/14/2006 9:13:37 PM
      - Insanity is defined as... - nick hoffman - 12/15/2006 6:25:38 AM
        
        a million flies can't be wrong: 2+2 =5 (n/t) - E.P. - 12/15/2006 4:37:38 PM
- Before VSE, it was another tune - LJK - 12/14/2006 2:47:55 PM
  - Who Have You Been Listening Too? - M.A.E. - 12/15/2006 12:36:59 AM
    - Golombeck, Squyres, and Bell - LJK - 12/15/2006 4:15:08 AM
      - re: Golombeck, Squyres, and Bell - Chris Vancil in AZ - 12/16/2006 2:17:49 AM
      - PS Don't Sweat The Sample Size - M.A.E. - 12/15/2006 6:03:11 AM
      - Your Words Don't Match - M.A.E. - 12/15/2006 5:59:14 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (12 posts)