But at least it was "fair and balanced"
Two paragraphs blaming Clinton by name and stating in no uncertain terms that he "appeased" terrorists. A single paragraph mea culpa admitting that "we" did certain unpleasant things in the name of "realism", during which, perhaps, Conservatives were, or were not, somewhere in the vicinity.
And you know, of course, that "appeasement" and "realism" are equally serious faults, just two sides of some coin, both representing an equal deficit of character and moral values. Right?
That's what balance looks like when you lean so far to the right as to asymptotically approach horizontal.