I'd love for there to be visiting (friendly) aliens.

Off Topic » in reply to Too bad

I'd love for there to be visiting (friendly) aliens.

alcaray — 1/31/2007 10:11:13 PM (archived)

Wanting something to be true is not a good enough reason to believe it is true. That's the way my head works, anyway.

The whole thread (43 posts)

Cell Phone Photos of O"Hare Airport UFO Surface. - Lindy - 1/27/2007 6:06:38 PM
- I must've lived a past life in Missouri - azstrummer - 1/29/2007 10:00:03 PM
  - Too bad - Martha - 1/30/2007 10:38:09 PM
    - I'd love for there to be visiting (friendly) aliens. - alcaray - 1/31/2007 10:11:13 PM
      - re: I'd love for there to be visiting (friendly) aliens. - Martha - 2/1/2007 12:04:35 AM
        
        I agree (n/t) - alcaray - 2/1/2007 12:42:44 AM
      - Ah, but who said I WANTED it to be true?... (n/t) - Martha - 1/31/2007 11:58:35 PM
    - I hope you're right - azstrummer - 1/31/2007 4:46:04 PM
      - I am....but I really do not expect - Martha - 1/31/2007 8:50:41 PM
    - Do not assume....... - Martha - 1/30/2007 10:46:18 PM
  - To each his own - Lindy - 1/29/2007 10:20:28 PM
    - re: To each his own - azstrummer - 1/29/2007 11:56:46 PM
      - re: To each his own - Lindy - 1/30/2007 3:29:50 AM
- Thank you Lindy for posting this!!!...I ABSOLUTELY believe!!!!! (n/t) - Martha - 1/28/2007 10:12:31 PM
  - I always have...read 1,000s' of books on this.... (n/t) - Beam me up Martha - 1/28/2007 10:14:20 PM
    - Ssshhh Martha - Lindy - 1/28/2007 10:39:30 PM
      - re: Ssshhh Martha - It is not make-believe Martha - 1/28/2007 11:19:13 PM
        
        Yoo Hoo...Lindy - making a point Martha - 1/29/2007 1:48:13 PM
        
        #179 - Fox - 1/30/2007 4:42:32 AM
        
        #301..... - Martha - 1/30/2007 10:11:33 PM
        
        You can bet your sweet bippy that.... - Pain in the arse Martha - 1/29/2007 2:03:48 PM
        
        Thank you - Lindy - 1/29/2007 3:37:38 PM
- Cell Phone Photo Examined by expert David Biedney - Lindy - 1/28/2007 9:04:43 PM
- New Eyewitness Surfaces - Lindy - 1/28/2007 7:08:13 PM
- first photo. - podrock - 1/28/2007 3:42:45 PM
  - re: first photo. - TB - 1/28/2007 10:20:14 PM
    - re: first photo. - podrock - 1/29/2007 12:13:22 AM
  - Debunked here? - Lindy - 1/28/2007 8:52:08 PM
  - the second photo... - podrock - 1/28/2007 5:14:01 PM
    - Show me the photos please - Lindy - 1/28/2007 6:44:47 PM
      - the photos - podrock - 1/28/2007 7:29:31 PM
        
        Third photo? - Lindy - 1/28/2007 8:58:09 PM
        
        "Somebody's out to scam and jump on the bandwagon here." - R.L. - 1/28/2007 9:42:55 PM
        
        Is this Flame? - Lindy - 1/28/2007 10:41:11 PM
        
        "you're not even back on the boards for 48 hours" - Arrell - 1/29/2007 6:28:01 AM
  - EXCELLENT work- thanks, teach... (n/t) - R.L. - 1/28/2007 3:49:31 PM
- Oh, well- THAT is certainly 'proof'' - R.L. - 1/28/2007 12:01:52 PM
- Out of the Blue - Lindy - 1/27/2007 11:51:32 PM
  - re: Out of the Blue - SteveS - 1/28/2007 4:52:01 AM
    - re: Out of the Blue - Lindy - 1/28/2007 5:08:41 AM
      - re: re:Yes I watched it - SteveS - 1/28/2007 4:49:02 PM
        
        40% then unexplainable? - Lindy - 1/28/2007 6:46:19 PM
        
        It STARTS with the 'Phoenix Lights' - R.L. - 1/28/2007 7:06:15 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (43 posts)