LOL! – Current Events – HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to Influence on climate scientists

LOL!

SDAI-Tech1 — 1/31/2007 10:31:33 PM (archived)

Here's all you need to know:

19% RESPONDED

OVER 50% reported no interference

The other 50% reported the largest type of "interference" under "PERCEIVED" interference.

So basically there is almost no interference at all in climate research, except in the minds of a small number of scientists.

And to be honest, I suspect they've already fudged their numbers to make it newsworthy at all. Whose going to audit the responses? It reminds me of those leftist teachers/principals correcting their dumb students tests so that they still get the funding even though they are failing to teach their charges.

Those stupid Katrina photos and iceberg photos are all meaningless to the paper too, but they tell of the complete and total agenda of the "USC".

Anything funded by the "Streisand Institute" has about as much credibility as a Michael Moore film - which is zip.

The whole thread (29 posts)

Influence on climate scientists - TB - 1/30/2007 8:25:08 PM
- LOL! - SDAI-Tech1 - 1/31/2007 10:31:33 PM
- It's like watching a train wreck, isn't it? - ER - 1/31/2007 1:47:46 PM
  - Personally, I like to burn tires... - Scott Evil - 1/31/2007 11:06:38 PM
  - It's been described as a train wreck in slow motion. (n/t) - et - 1/31/2007 5:58:08 PM
  - Which train wreck? - alcaray - 1/31/2007 4:53:50 PM
    - Agenda-driven government agencies suddenly exposed to the hot needle of inquiry. - ER - 1/31/2007 6:30:07 PM
      - Ouch! - alcaray - 1/31/2007 6:34:24 PM
- Quotes from the executive summary - Laurie Street - 1/30/2007 9:28:42 PM
  - That's why you need the paper. - TB - 1/30/2007 10:05:02 PM
    - Tom....always defending the offenders - Lindy - 1/31/2007 9:26:29 PM
    - re: That's why you need the paper - Fox - 1/31/2007 5:10:18 AM
    - You're trying too hard, TB - Robert - 1/31/2007 1:58:23 AM
    - re: That's why you need the paper. - Yeti - 1/31/2007 1:11:24 AM
      - Politics - TB - 1/31/2007 5:48:19 AM
        
        re: Politics - alcaray - 1/31/2007 11:30:45 PM
        
        Still trying too hard, TB - Robert - 1/31/2007 7:22:02 PM
        
        Look up the "Science Wars" of the 1990s. - TB - 1/31/2007 9:48:27 PM
    - A question - Laurie Street - 1/30/2007 11:08:41 PM
      - What would it take? - TB - 1/31/2007 6:54:48 AM
        
        "I believe that natural cycles are the cause of the majority of what we are seeing now..." - et - 1/31/2007 7:40:01 AM
        
        re: "I believe that natural cycles are the cause of the majority of what we are seeing now..." - gbaikie - 1/31/2007 9:20:05 AM
      - Questions - gbaikie - 1/31/2007 6:40:23 AM
- Preemptive strike, damage control, or the road to Damascus? (n/t) - ER - 1/30/2007 9:06:42 PM
  - Information. - TB - 1/30/2007 9:29:25 PM
- Congressional oversight and exposure is "noise", huh? - et - 1/30/2007 9:04:40 PM
  - A great portion of it, yes. - TB - 1/30/2007 9:07:27 PM
    - I don't think that word means what you think it does. - et - 1/30/2007 9:16:23 PM
      - I see you listened to the sermon last Sunday! - Scott Evil - 1/31/2007 11:10:16 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (29 posts)