An apology is what is right.
(with apologies to Johnnie Cochran)
No change in tactics, Chris. I'm calling you out on your accusation. I quoted your words, and I asked you to prove them.
I don't understand your first paragraph. It has nothing to do with my post. You said I attacked Mr. Beattie. I asked you to prove it. What you wrote is a complete non-sequitur. Which is a change in tactics on your part when you're being called upon to prove your words.
I had already posted the link, Chris.
If your next words are neither a citation of my alleged "attack" on Mr. Beattie, or an apology for falsely accusing me therof, then there is nothing further to say. There's no point in talking to someone who won't stand behind their word.
Space/Science » in reply to re: Hum....That's Okay
If you cannot cite...
