.........and then, with a sprinkling of fairy dust and a sowing of dragon's teeth, from completely out of the blue came an Islamic Revolution on a nationwide, almost regional scale.
Funny how that happens Tom.
I cant take these fantasy arguments anymore.
Original Line:
When it comes down to it, there probably wouldn't be an Islamic movement if the Shahs were still running Iran.
I mean, come on .......
Thats up there with your most ludicrous lines ever.
If the Czars were still running Russia, there prob wouldnt be a Bolshevik revolution.
If the Brits were still running America, there probably wouldn't be any world wars coz the whole map would be coloured pink and we'd violently suppress anyone who didnt take tiffin at 2pm sharp.
Current Events » in reply to Spelling it out
"and until the end of the 70s, was quite effectively suppressed."
The whole thread (22 posts)
- Update on Democratic victory results
- Ds - "The party has no frigging idea what to do about the war in Iraq." This is tiresome.
- "This is tiresome." So is your constant advocacy of totalitarianism.
- "probably wouldn't be an Islamic movement if the Shahs were still running Iran. "
- Go for it.
- See if you can answer a simple question
- No one pretends the Shah with CIA help wasn't brutal and repressive.
- Go for it.
- Shall we go down the list of totalitarian regimes Conservatives support?
- "probably wouldn't be an Islamic movement if the Shahs were still running Iran. "
- "This is tiresome." So is your constant advocacy of totalitarianism.
- Ds - "The party has no frigging idea what to do about the war in Iraq." This is tiresome.
