Space/Science » in reply to re: Bell is clearly not an engineering systems analyst as nearly every assumption he makes is wrong.

The whole thread (21 posts)

• Rocket plane reliability - Raoul - 3/8/2007 6:53:15 PM
  • Reliability is more of a maintenance issue. - SDF - 3/9/2007 2:20:50 PM
  • Bell is clearly not an engineering systems analyst as nearly every assumption he makes is wrong. - Chris Vancil - 3/8/2007 11:20:06 PM
    • re: Bell is clearly not an engineering systems analyst as nearly every assumption he makes is wrong. - a - 3/10/2007 7:41:18 PM
      • re: More on the WWII Messerschmitt Me-163 Rocket Plane - Chris Vancil - 3/13/2007 11:03:56 PM
      • re: Bell is clearly not an engineering systems analyst as nearly every assumption he makes is wrong. - Chris Vancil - 3/10/2007 10:01:56 PM
        • Non-experimental rocket planes... - a - 3/11/2007 10:55:53 PM
          • re: Non-experimental rocket planes... - Doug Ellison - 3/12/2007 3:25:45 PM
            • re: Non-experimental rocket planes... - a - 3/12/2007 10:16:39 PM
              • re: Non-experimental rocket planes... - Chris Vancil - 3/13/2007 6:28:34 AM
                • re: Non-experimental rocket planes... - a - 3/13/2007 10:58:15 PM
                  • re: Non-experimental rocket planes... - Chris Vancil - 3/13/2007 11:33:48 PM
    • Typical Bell - Doug Ellison - 3/9/2007 8:14:47 AM
      • Yes. - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 3/9/2007 4:42:48 PM
    • The hybrid engines used for SS1 and SS2 are far safer than the engines used on any X plane. - Lee - 3/9/2007 7:46:44 AM
    • Ditto. - TB - 3/8/2007 11:56:21 PM
      • re: 100 test flights?? - Raoul - 3/10/2007 4:07:03 PM
        • re: 100 test flights?? - a - 3/10/2007 7:34:56 PM
          • Huge difference - Raoul - 3/11/2007 11:50:46 AM
            • re: Huge difference - a - 3/11/2007 11:00:57 PM
              • SpaceShip Two not that expensive to fly. - TB - 3/12/2007 3:41:18 AM