Your question requires that I accept your premise, and I don't.
I don't care about the attorney replacements one way or the other, any more than I care about who the White House hires to take dictation.
Don't you understand that Democrats screaming at the top of their lungs that something is a crime against the constitution, God and man, is not a mandate for me to make a moral judgement on something only they pretend is a moral issue?
There is nothing illegal about the replacement of the attorneys, and as I'm pointing out with the examples of the actual cases, there isn't even anything unethical about it.
If there is one real issue remaining, it's Gonzales failing to report things accurately. Like the Plame case, eventually this issue will degrade to "lying to Congress" about a crime that never happened.
If anything, I'm disappointed that the Bush administration has handled this badly. Instead of running scared, talking about "mistakes," and tossing people to the wolves, which only makes the wolves hungrier, they should have stood up and told the accusers to put up or shut up, and been perfectly honest about all this.
Flame » in reply to AGAIN... DO YOU SUPPORT THESE ACTIONS, OR DENOUNCE THEM?
You're getting shrill.
The whole thread (41 posts)
- Preemptive cross posting to Flame for TB and GB
- re: Preemptive cross posting to Flame for TB and GB
- Point out where I said "all presidents," or amend your header. (n/t)
- No idea what you're talking about.
- What the hell's your point, then?
- What do you mean "back to that"?
- The Premise...and a reference
- re: The Premise of your argument is that nothing unusual is going on
- "unusual" is not automatically "wrong," never mind "illegal."
- P.S. Show me where I ever used the word "illegal". Your word, not mine. (n/t)
- Clarification...
- You can lead a horse to water
- Give up. He says Bush didn't lie about torture, too.
- You can type it all you like. It's still a lie.
- You can lead a horse to water
- re: If you havent yet seen that the Attoney General lied to Congress...
- "unusual" is not automatically "wrong," never mind "illegal."
- re: The Premise of your argument is that nothing unusual is going on
- Did I not type slowly enough?
- No fake names in this, please. (n/t)
- Sorry.. Should have been (n/t)
- That works. (n/t)
- Sorry.. Should have been (n/t)
- No fake names in this, please. (n/t)
- Has anybody ever told you that you don't know how to make an argument?
- The Premise...and a reference
- What do you mean "back to that"?
- What the hell's your point, then?
- No idea what you're talking about.
