The article may be dated a week or so ago, but the tweet was posted yesterday, a day and a half after the incident in question--it's a commentary on it. The tweet was subsequently removed, of course, after it was noticed. SOP for the NRA.
BTW, the article wasn't very reassuring. The examples they give of "fun" targets are basically kid's toys, the message being, shoot up your toys because guns are toys. Jacks, animal figures, exploding targets that make fun loud noises, everything brightly-colored to attract the infantile eye...nothing sick there, oh no.
Isn't the message that shooting should be fun for kids just a bit at odds with so-called "responsible gun ownership"? Are they really necessary tools of self-defense, or are guns just toys for children of all ages?
Current Events » in reply to http://www.womensoutdoornews.com/2014/08/7-ways-children-can-fun-shooting-range/
Look at the timestamp on the tweet
The whole thread (23 posts)
- You can take my Uzi when you dig the bullet out of my cold, dead brain