Your earlier post raised the premise that the majority of racists are Republicans. I have responded to this in two ways: showing that paternalism is no less racist, and posting an article showing examples of many Democrats, of which Clinton was certainly not the worst offender, expressing racist and bigoted views. Unlike Republicans with such views, Democrats seem to be immune to consequences along these lines.
That you leaped on the Clinton reference (which steered the rest of this thread) was not surprising, I suppose.
Incidentally, Al Gore may not lobby for oil companies (although we could have a little fun with that, too), but he plays conservationist while doing anything but conserving in his own life. His fans seem to buy that, too.
Liberals have carefully constructed images of their heroes that seem to be relatively immune to the facts.
Current Events » in reply to Work on your reading comprehension
And incidentally...
The whole thread (28 posts)
- Go ahead, it's ok to call Republicans racists.
- To clarify
- Soft racism
- re: To clarify
- It ain't all magnolias and mint-julips
- Well said. (n/t)
- To clarify