Not really.
I'm not impressed by the CIA--which has been waffling on this the whole time--redefining the word "covert" to fit Plame. There was a specific law that this investigation was called around, and the CIA is still avoiding it.
And as far as the lie about the defense not wanting the subject brought into the trial, can you point out York's factual error for me? Wells' attempt to get an actual damage assessment is a matter of open record, as is Fitzgerald's constant squelching of it. Do I need to haul out frigging transcripts?