Redifined "covert" to fit Plame?

Current Events » in reply to Not really.

Tony — 6/13/2007 1:33:45 PM (archived)

Cite?

Did I say anything at all York, Wells and Fitzgerald and who wanted it on the table?

While the reporter may be wrong, the whole thing is irrelevant in a perjury trial, until you get to sentencing.

The whole thread (15 posts)

5 Myths About Scooter and the Slammer - alcaray - 6/12/2007 2:31:38 AM
- re: 5 Myths About Scooter and the Slammer - TB - 6/12/2007 3:29:34 AM
  - To answer your question... - alcaray - 6/13/2007 12:14:13 AM
  - Glad to see you finally believe Plame was covert. - Tony - 6/12/2007 2:35:04 PM
    - Not really. - TB - 6/12/2007 4:18:07 PM
      - Redifined "covert" to fit Plame? - Tony - 6/13/2007 1:33:45 PM
        
        You can't have it both ways. - TB - 6/13/2007 8:34:48 PM
        
        You're a better engineer than lawyer - dtb - 6/15/2007 12:27:55 AM
        
        Though I'm sure your indictment of the left was accurate and fair... - alcaray - 6/14/2007 12:13:24 AM
        
        re: indictment of the left - TB - 6/14/2007 1:50:42 AM
        
        "what this trial was meant to accomplish"... - alcaray - 6/14/2007 4:26:16 AM
        
        Look up how many CIA leaks are referred to the DOJ every year. - TB - 6/14/2007 4:53:57 AM
        
        We aren't? Show me. (n/t) - alcaray - 6/14/2007 4:51:54 PM
        
        Details - TB - 6/13/2007 8:39:49 PM
  - One more thing... - TB - 6/12/2007 3:34:35 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)