You know I'm aware of the same science you are. The carbon isotope studies, the CO2 tracking, the ice cores, the temperature curves, and all the rest. I have most of the studies bookmarked, and could pull them up here.

So you either have to assume I'm an idiot--someone who, on a really good contract, gets paid six figures for sitting in my garage, integrating large amounts of information, and finding design solutions nobody else has--or assume I've put at least as much thought into this as you have but am not about to jump to a conclusion, especially when that conclusion has as much political baggage on it as it does.

Any theory has to explain the outlier data. Either that, or the data itself has to be proven false.

There is a LOT of outlier data.

Didn't it bother you even a little when the 1970s temperature dip was tossed off and quickly swept under the rug with some quick patch about particulates?