re: Melting the rubble?

Space/Science » in reply to Melting the rubble?

phil — 8/7/2007 7:22:48 PM (archived)

Whatever they claim we really need to validate beforehand with in situ visits to hopefully representative NEOs. All else is speculation and look how many times informed scientists have been dead wrong about solar system objects beforehand...and extrasolar planets.

The whole thread (15 posts)

Armageddon Nuke Armed Spacecraft - phil - 8/7/2007 2:28:52 PM
- I had a feeling about this all along, I called it..... - Jeff F - 8/7/2007 2:41:30 PM
  - We should study the planetoid up close first - New Age Vapors - 8/7/2007 2:51:36 PM
    - Melting the rubble? - Buck Galaxy - 8/7/2007 6:13:43 PM
      - No - minimising shock waves - nick hoffman - 8/8/2007 3:18:06 AM
      - re: Melting the rubble? - phil - 8/7/2007 7:22:48 PM
        
        an example of a pile of rubble: Itokawa - Raoul - 8/7/2007 7:34:46 PM
        
        It would be fun to test some theories on that one... - TAFKASE - 8/7/2007 7:46:50 PM
    - re: We should study the planetoid up close first - phil - 8/7/2007 3:02:54 PM
      - re: We should study the planetoid up close first - TB - 8/7/2007 5:16:20 PM
        
        objecting to solutions - phil - 8/7/2007 5:54:17 PM
        
        They're just kids talkin' crazy talk - New Age Vapors - 8/8/2007 4:41:03 AM
        
        Another reason not to blow up space rocks - New Age Vapors - 8/7/2007 5:32:53 PM
      - Don't worry, I'm not anti-nuke - New Age Vapors - 8/7/2007 4:07:12 PM
        
        re: Don't worry, I'm not anti-nuke Dittos (n/t) - p - 8/7/2007 4:17:15 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)