Let's assume the CIA has sophisticated 'interogation methods...

Current Events » in reply to Bush defends (secret) CIA detentions, says no torture

Jacob Samorodin — 10/5/2007 10:10:11 PM (archived)

...then you have to ask: Do those techniques [some chemical, no doubt; some deprivation; some verbally coercive] qualify as 'torture'?

Doesn't it depend on the definition?
And whose definition?

Jake

The whole thread (7 posts)

Bush defends (secret) CIA detentions, says no torture - Bowser - 10/5/2007 6:29:41 PM
- There can only be one valid definition of torture. - ER - 10/6/2007 6:45:37 PM
  - re: There can only be one valid definition of torture. - TB - 10/6/2007 8:47:13 PM
    - Well, I promised myself I'd never say this... - ER - 10/6/2007 10:17:44 PM
      - re: Well - TB - 10/6/2007 11:19:39 PM
- Let's assume the CIA has sophisticated 'interogation methods... - Jacob Samorodin - 10/5/2007 10:10:11 PM
  - The CIA has acknowledged some of what it does. - Bowser - 10/6/2007 12:49:18 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (7 posts)