Ah, WWII again.

Current Events » in reply to Focus on results, not costs. Rumsfeld

Ah, WWII again.

TB — 10/24/2007 7:46:39 PM (archived)

And I'll give the same response I give every time:

If we were using the same tactics and weapons we'd used in WWII, this war would have been a lot shorter.

The whole thread (16 posts)

Bush's spending record. - TB - 10/24/2007 4:32:30 PM
- A HUGE difference. - Bowser - 10/24/2007 7:46:59 PM
  - In your world, why do you think the Republicans lost Congress? (n/t) - TB - 10/24/2007 8:25:43 PM
    - Corruption, Bush, Iraq, pork, hypocrisy, lies, familiarity breeds contempt - Tony - 10/24/2007 9:06:02 PM
      - I'd like to think assault on rights would be up there too. - alcaray - 10/24/2007 11:09:29 PM
- War costs may total $2.4 trillion - Jack Herer - 10/24/2007 4:58:22 PM
  - "Help me understand what the American people recieved for $2.4 Trillion? " - Lindy - 10/25/2007 2:35:16 AM
  - A couple of more from Rumsfeld. - Bowser - 10/24/2007 7:17:18 PM
    - and one from Cheyne - Jack Herer - 10/24/2007 7:36:54 PM
  - Focus on results, not costs. Rumsfeld - Bowser - 10/24/2007 7:11:33 PM
    - Ah, WWII again. - TB - 10/24/2007 7:46:39 PM
  - re: War costs may total $2.4 trillion - TB - 10/24/2007 5:18:43 PM
    - So spending money to help people is bad, but spending money to kill people is good? - Laurie Street - 10/24/2007 9:05:02 PM
      - re: So spending money to help people is bad, but spending money to kill people is good? - gbaikie - 10/25/2007 12:26:06 AM
    - Should say "spending much ON Iraq." - TB - 10/24/2007 5:19:42 PM
- Congress also stinking up the joint... - TB - 10/24/2007 4:41:19 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (16 posts)