re: Larry Craig brings an interesting argument.
In regards to the method of capture, it seems that using "free speech" as a defense is an admission of guilt in itself?
The 1st amendment- how and when did we stray so far from the letter of the law? What horrors would befallen us if speech was narrowly defined as the spoken or written word? Do we really need to protect offensive public works of art and now, the secret codes of people wanting public sex?