What is apparent is that the Musharraf outfit lied and covered up the circumstances around the Bhutto assassination until they could no longer carry it off. There are too many videos out there showing she was shot. Additionally, the Land Rover in which she was riding was "bomb proof", and no one else in it was hurt.

Anyone wonder why they wouldn't just let events take their course, but felt it necessary to lie early, lie often and lie hard?

"Missing Evidence from Bhutto's Murder"

"Ministry backtracks on Bhutto sunroof claims"

"Doctors cite pressure to keep silent on Bhutto.
Doctors who treated Pakistan opposition leader say records removed"

Often, lying about a crime is considered evidence of a crime. Indeed, lying about a crime IS a crime.

Arf