So lets get this straight.

You were shown in excruciating detail why your theories are not even possibly correct. You were shown via the same system of physics that put men on the moon, split the atom and lights the modern age. The same system of thought that allows us not to see half our children die before age 5. You were shown by people who have spent decades studying this stuff and apply it in rocket science and astronomical observatories. You were shown all of this in an open forum and given every opportunity to demonstrate the correctness of your ideas.

Instead, you demonstrated a lack of understanding of the same physics that can be found in high schools, or perhaps at best first-year college courses. Meanwhile you claim to have 'derived' a superior formulation of Mass-Energy equivalence to Einsteins- and done so from the bible no less.

Beyond all of this, you claim that you have some sort of unique scientific insight into climate change and global warming that contradicts voluminous hard research, backed with hard data and based on the very same physics that you have not been able to grasp. You can't defend this insight. You can't prove this insight. You can't even show that the mechanism you claim as central to your theory is even possible.

And you say that the problem is that 'other' people don't want to believe the words of wisdom dripping from you blessed mind.

I don't know why you can't be treated like a contemptible crank- one who stands as an exemplar or herald of a possible dark age. A dark age where the vocabulary of science is co-opted by the superstitious to promulgate essentially religious and pre-literate ideas. A dark age where contemptible cranks are granted the same respect, gravitas and bandwidth as scientists, logicians, mathematicians and scholars.

I am told that I am supposed to respect you and your right to voice your ideas. That I am supposed to object to the idea and not you. But you have been patiently shown a dozen if not more times , in excruciating detail, that you are wrong! And still you do not yield, and still you do not cease pushing your notions. I know for a fact that there are uneducated or unintelligent folks out there who will buy what you are selling, and it is through them that you will do your damage, while 'polite folk' demand I desist in railing against you as I would any other insidious person spreading anti-enlightenment darkness- the bigots, the despots, the tyrants and the racists.

I would not have you censored in America at large. But It seems contemporary rules of polite society would demand that I afford you respect you do not deserve or be censored myself. Some people here see a simple case of a person that is defective in some trivial, banal and harmless way. I see a disease. I see the undoing of the brief summer of reason in the west. We're marching back to the stone age- albeit a nuclear armed stone age, led by a vangaurd of Johanneses, Dt Emotos, Rhonda Byrneses and etc etc etc. All the religious thinking of the bronze age, with all the destructive capabilities of the atomic.

Want to bet how long the human race will survive that condition?

To finish, 2 things:

1) It must be so frustrating to be the only person to know the truth and be publicly derided by all. Why persist? Why not simply stop with this stuff or go away (please, choose the second!). Surely it must be a sign of deep psychological defect to persist?

2) No doubt some here will demand that this be moved to flame- but note... Not once did I call you a name, genuinely insult you, or etc.