You wrote a satirical bit comparing allowing the "wrong" opinions on this forum to the risk of importing terrorists.

When I pointed that out, you flipped over to "Islamic vs. right-wing killings" in the U.S., the evil NRA, and a third thing about a death penalty case I'm still trying to figure out as far as its relevance.

I picked up on the first one, and pointed out the problem with the assumptions and methodology. The problems get deeper as you go into their website. Somehow "non-Islamic extremists" mutate into "right-wing extremists," although they concede their database also contains extremists with "left wing, or idiosyncratic beliefs." When you look at "individuals charged" it gets more problematical. And of course, nobody is correcting for the populations of these elements in America either, are they?

You ignored that, and leaped over to gun murders, and the War in Iraq(!), which have nothing to do with the original point, any more than automobile deaths do.

Then you flipped over to talk radio, the GOP, and Trump again, who seems to be eating your brain out. I've seen squirrels with more linearity. I'm just following you around the tree.

Okay, let's talk Trump then.

Settle down and think. The only way he becomes President is if he first wins the nomination, and then a big pile of Democrats votes for him over Hillary. Work that brain worm for a while.

Note that the important polls right now aren't the primaries, but the more inclusive candidate vs. candidate ones.

This poll has to contain a lot of Democrats, and in the cumulative tally Clinton hasn't been more than 4.5 points ahead of Trump since the beginning of September. As an aside, right now Cruz, Rubio and Carson are all closer to her than that.