You mentioned one line about that subject, then enthusiastically dived into your usual "reactionary economics" speech about taxes, pollution, and the Evil Rich as the drivers behind the current voter discontent. "Follow the money" you said.
I did. I pointed out what the real issues with the current election are, and how the "evil rich" weren't actually doing so well right now.
I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that somehow I'm "blaming" you for anything in this thread.
Nor do I understand how you could have read what I wrote and projected "entrepreneureal fantasies" or "cable TV news BS" anywhere in any of those sentences. The subject was the election, what's driving it, how it's not about the big donors any more, and how it's about a lot more than just Trump.
I'm beginning to think you don't even read my posts any more. You just make up something your straw man version of me would say and then respond to that.
I must admit, that would save me a lot of effort.
Flame » in reply to Nope. Because you didn't address what I brought up in my post.
Sorry, no.
The whole thread (15 posts)
- The Troglodyte Tetrafecta: sex, violence, race and religion
