And the same piece could be written. The fact is, that the science is there, tested, has yielded empirically valid inferences, is internally consistent- etc.

There is no debate, Tom- you are like an I.D-er. You just want there to be a debate, so much so you claim that the absence of evidence is caused by a conspiracy.

I think its really quite interesting that you were unable to even come close to a 'win' in the factual debate that discussed the science, or in a debate concerning the literature.

But instead, you chose to continue the debate in the domain of politics with this post.

Your Politics, I think you should have discovered by now, are a really bad indicator of reality. If there was a table in Vegas where I could have bet against every one of your positions- I would be a wealthy man.

Heres laughing at you, Tom. You can't get it right, have not gotten it right, couldn't pull your head out of your ass with forceps and a flashlight- but still you truck on... Oblivious to the end. Being Tom B. means never saying you're wrong.

Yeti