What information? Tom, your rap hasn't changed, it's the same old litany. And you still are amazed that people don't just roll over and accept it simply because you've said it before? I notice that you instantly dismiss every embarrassing fact about your administration that has ever been mentioned previously, as if your opponents were only allowed to use a point once.

Read MY original post and refute what are no longer my "facts", but history. Just because you say the liberal media has re-written history doesn't mean it hasn't happened. It's not my politics, I grudgingly give the Elder Bush credit where it's due; I demonstrate exactly why my mind has changed about the war, you simply just keep on flogging the same dead horse because your mind doesn't change.

The best thing you can say about the Bush policy is that the minute it was abandoned things got better in Iraq. You're perfectly ready to take credit for the improvement, but not the reason for it. And the reason you think that way is ideology. Period. You can stomp and snit all you want but you simply cannot face the fact that your man has failed. And you cannot see that any in any other way than as a failure of your ideology, so you refuse to accept it. Well it is a failure of your ideology. You cannot coerce democracy into existence.

Well, if it makes you feel any better, liberals can and do fail, and sometimes they fail for ideological reasons; but when the same failure happened to LBJ it was his partisans that first questioned his policies. So far, the only criticisms I've ever heard you level at the neocon white house is that they don't veto enough spending bills and that they didn't crush Faluja the first time they went in. nd that, of course, must be the liberals' fault.

No one's listening Tom. And no one cares.