I have a lot of evidence that you aren't stuck on stupid. It's why I'm not giving up.
For you, even the suggestion that we could seek ways to end the conflict is equivalent to promoting American capitulation, isn't it?
This sentence implies that the anti-war people have proposed ways of ending the conflict that are NOT American capitulation and that I'm being unfair or inaccurate by making them equivalent.
Certainly none of them are proposing we win the war, another way of ending a conflict, so we can eliminate that one.
So what are these "ways of ending the conflict" aside from capitulation? Who has proposed them?
Point out a single Democratic leader (other than Lieberman) or an anti-war group who has proposed anything---ANYTHING--other than removing our troops within a specific deadline, regardless of the status of our enemies, or the conditions on the battlefield.
Current Events » in reply to It's ok, I'm used to getting shoved around by you
All I'm asking you to do is think.
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Sorry, John McCain, you can't have him!
- Alex will be a safe, NY broker.
- re: Sorry, John McCain, you can't have him!
- Fact check
- That's a ludicrous "fact-check"
- Korea
- "sometimes I wonder if the war would have gone better...."
- "...we would surrender if our enemies would just commit enough violence"
- Just a couple quick points
- In the US, soldiers are armed and enlist.
- Korea
- That's a ludicrous "fact-check"
- re: you can't have him
- Are we anticipating a draft?
