You've already tried that tactic of denying that a smear campaign created by Republicans directed against a Democrat is actually a Republican smear campaign. A year and half ago, in fact, on the original smear thread. It doesn't work any better today than it did then.
"Care to trot over to Obama's own website and see what we can find there?" Oh, hey, go for it! Seriously. I dare you to try to show any equivalency or symmetry at all between Floyd the Brown Stain's efforts and Obama's campaign site. Find me anything on barackobama.com that a reasonable person would recognize as a smear.
It must be killing you and the rest of the Wingnuts that Obama's run such a clean campaign so far, and shows every prospect of keeping it clean through November. He's left you very little wiggle room to try the "the Democrats made me do it!" snivel and whine. That won't stop the Republican smears, of course, but the lack of rhetorical cover makes it even more obvious how central are the smears and the overall negativity to Republicanism; take those away, and you got nothing.
Flame » in reply to Okay, now that you've set the height of the bar...
Like a dog returning to vomit...
The whole thread (30 posts)
- Obamanomalism
- If the ends don't justify the means, what does?"-- Pat Buchanan
- But wait, there's more
- When you can't defend your positions on policy, I guess it's natural to turn to smear campaigns (n/t)
- re: Obamanomalism
