The link appears to have been disabled by the National Review.
Are you able to provide the author of the article, its title, and when it was published? This is an op-ed piece. I'd like to know whose op it is. "Consider the source", you know.
I'd also like to see how the Obama campaign classified the campaign payments. He says they were "disguised". Considering that he has absolutely nothing but "welfare state" boilerplate argument, and that he tries to tar Obama by association by bringing up investigations into people employed by an organization he was affiliated with, it looks like more guilt by innuendo. It really is possible to miscategorize payments and make accounting errors.
In the meantime, Sarah Palin has shown a positive pattern of abuse of power in the offices she's held.