re: WHAT assertions of mine are you talking about?

Flame » in reply to WHAT assertions of mine are you talking about?

Johannes — 10/2/2008 3:11:05 AM (archived)

It seems to me that you have been hounding TB because he supported a view that now is attributed to be wrong.

You support the view that there are no â€œunexplainedâ€ happenings in the sky, perhaps you are wrong.

Sometimes the view that you support may turn out to be wrong.

If TB = W then RL may also = W

The whole thread (14 posts)

Has RL also been wrong? - Johannes - 10/1/2008 11:38:02 PM
- Making no sense whatsoever- as usual - ARRELL - 10/2/2008 1:32:03 AM
  - re: Jack is on topic on SPACE - Johannes - 10/2/2008 2:20:56 AM
- The subject side of your brain doesn't seem to be talking to the message text side. (n/t) - alcaray - 10/2/2008 12:10:18 AM
  - re: I know that you guys can not - Johannes - 10/2/2008 2:36:33 AM
    - Sorry I'm so dense. I have no idea what all these things have to do with each other. (n/t) - alcaray - 10/2/2008 2:49:56 AM
    - WHAT assertions of mine are you talking about? (n/t) - ARRELL - 10/2/2008 2:43:39 AM
      - re: WHAT assertions of mine are you talking about? - Johannes - 10/2/2008 3:11:05 AM
        
        I have Never supported that view- ever... - ARRELL - 10/2/2008 3:41:57 AM
        
        re: Even the 3 letters U.F.O. seem to scare you. - Johannes - 10/2/2008 7:17:26 PM
        
        You have a serious comprehension problem... - ARRELL - 10/3/2008 4:17:08 PM
        
        re: You are implying that you know the â€œtruthâ€ for every case that has happened. - Johannes - 10/6/2008 6:45:25 PM
        
        Nope, never implied that once.... sigh.... your stupidity is not my problem.... - ARRELL - 10/7/2008 4:14:14 AM
        
        re. Why is it that you are unable to answer questions? - Johannes - 10/7/2008 4:58:31 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (14 posts)