If I'm not mistaken that's in spite of a bailout.
California is asking for that even though the bailout has been voted. (The questions are mostly statements, not really needing answers.)
Why does California have to rely upon borrowed money to operate? We're talking operating expenses here, not capital improvements.
Would it be best to encourage that great State to operate with the funds it has? Especially considering the resourses the State has to raise money?
